rfc9778v1.txt		rfc9778.txt
	skipping to change at line 135 ¶		skipping to change at line 135 ¶
	* The reference for the registry has been changed to this document.		* The reference for the registry has been changed to this document.
	Note that the policy for assigning Code values for new IGMP Types		Note that the policy for assigning Code values for new IGMP Types
	MUST be defined in the document defining the new Type value.		MUST be defined in the document defining the new Type value.
	2.1.2. Multicast Listener Discovery		2.1.2. Multicast Listener Discovery
	As with IGMP, the MLD header also contains Type and Code fields.		As with IGMP, the MLD header also contains Type and Code fields.
	Assignment of those fields within the MLD header is defined in		Assignment of those fields within the MLD header is defined in
	[RFC4443] with a registration policy of IETF Review.		[RFC4443] with a registration policy of IETF Review; see
			<https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters>.
	2.2. IGMP/MLD Query Message Flags		2.2. IGMP/MLD Query Message Flags
	IANA has created the "IGMP/MLD Query Message Flags" registry for the		IANA has created the "IGMP/MLD Query Message Flags" registry for the
	bits in the Flags field of the MLDv2 Query Message [RFC9777] and the		bits in the Flags field of the MLDv2 Query Message [RFC9777] and the
	IGMPv3 Query Message [RFC9776]. It has been populated as follows:		IGMPv3 Query Message [RFC9776]. It has been populated as follows:
	+===========+============+=============+===========+		+===========+============+=============+===========+
	| Flags Bit | Short Name | Description | Reference |		| Flags Bit | Short Name | Description | Reference |
	+===========+============+=============+===========+		+===========+============+=============+===========+
	| 0 | E | Extension | [RFC9279] |		| 0 | E | Extension | [RFC9279] |
	+-----------+------------+-------------+-----------+		+-----------+------------+-------------+-----------+
	| 1-3 | Unassigned |		| 1-3 | Unassigned |
	+-----------+--------------------------------------+		+-----------+--------------------------------------+
	Table 1: IGMP/MLD Query Message Flags Registry		Table 1: IGMP/MLD Query Message Flags Registry
	The Flags Bit value in the registry above corresponds to the column		The Flags Bit value in the registry above corresponds to the column
	header in the packet format diagrams in [RFC9777] and [RFC9776].		header in the packet format diagrams in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of
			[RFC9776] and Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of [RFC9777].
	The initial contents of this registry contain the E-bit defined in
	[RFC9279].
	The assignment of new bit flags within the Flags field requires		The assignment of new bit flags within the Flags field requires
	Standards Action.		Standards Action.
	2.3. IGMP/MLD Report Message Flags		2.3. IGMP/MLD Report Message Flags
	IANA has created the "IGMP/MLD Report Message Flags" registry for the		IANA has created the "IGMP/MLD Report Message Flags" registry for the
	bits in the Flags field of the MLDv2 Report Message and the IGMPv3		bits in the Flags field of the MLDv2 Report Message and the IGMPv3
	Report Message. It has been populated as follows:		Report Message. It has been populated as follows:
	skipping to change at line 181 ¶		skipping to change at line 180 ¶
	| 0 | E | Extension | [RFC9279] |		| 0 | E | Extension | [RFC9279] |
	+-----------+------------+-------------+-----------+		+-----------+------------+-------------+-----------+
	| 1-15 | Unassigned |		| 1-15 | Unassigned |
	+-----------+--------------------------------------+		+-----------+--------------------------------------+
	Table 2: IGMP/MLD Report Message Flags Registry		Table 2: IGMP/MLD Report Message Flags Registry
	The Flags Bit value in the registry above corresponds to the column		The Flags Bit value in the registry above corresponds to the column
	header in the packet format diagrams in [RFC9777] and [RFC9776].		header in the packet format diagrams in [RFC9777] and [RFC9776].
	The initial contents of this registry includes the E-bit defined in
	[RFC9279].
	The assignment of new bit flags within the Flags field requires		The assignment of new bit flags within the Flags field requires
	Standards Action.		Standards Action.
	3. Security Considerations		3. Security Considerations
	Security analyzers such as firewalls and network intrusion detection		Security analyzers such as firewalls and network intrusion detection
	monitors often rely on unambiguous interpretations of the fields		monitors often rely on unambiguous interpretations of the fields
	described in this memo. As new values for the fields are assigned,		described in this memo. As new values for the fields are assigned,
	existing security analyzers that do not understand the new values may		existing security analyzers that do not understand the new values may
	fail, resulting in either loss of connectivity if the analyzer		fail, resulting in either loss of connectivity if the analyzer
End of changes. 3 change blocks.
	8 lines changed or deleted		4 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48.