=====
From zekaric@yahoo.ca:
Without reading the description I wouldn't have understood what I was seeing as
it related to F&I.  Looks like it would be ok as a wall paper on newer theatre
wide screend.  Nice image but maybe a bit of a stretch.
=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Interesting idea but the image is pretty simple.

=====
From iacopo.mochi@tele2.it:
Nice idea. Maybe you could have emphasized more the ice and vapour phases.
=====
From ian_c_thornton@hotmail.com:
This image has really grown on me since the last time I viewed it.  This could
never be photographed in real life but it looks like a photo.  Technically
perfect IMHO.




=====
From limdaepl@gmx.de:
Nice interpretation! The contrast between solid and fluid could however be
stronger (almost not recognizeable). I would also have loved to see the density
following a constant gradient from left (maximum) to right (minimum, as is)
without that gathering at the center of the image.
=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Yes, I got the concept.  It is a creative approach to the topic, nicely rendered
 However, personally I would have liked to see actual fire and ice.
=====
From s.day@uel.ac.uk:
A nice looking and good quality render.

=====
From jgrimbert@free.fr:
Collisions does occur, and it should not.
Moreover, the picture is wrong because water is a polar molecul
which make, as liquid, a kind of snake pattern... ok, not realistic,
but no fire either !

=====
From fcueto@rice.edu:
Loved it. Very original.