=====
From zekaric@yahoo.ca:
Pretty in it's simplicity.  Nice work.  Flame is the weak part of the whole
image though and could be better.  But then fire isn't a simple thing to do.
=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Nice image & concept. The flame looks a bit odd, and the ice matches don't seem
to be refractive (the match on top isn't distorting the image of the ones
below).

=====
From ian_c_thornton@hotmail.com:
Nice use of lighting but the flame is a very odd shape.


=====
From limdaepl@gmx.de:
Simple but nice! However a more realistic flame would have added much to the
quality of the image. Maybe a higher fading power of the light source whould
have helped to seperate the scenery from the background.
=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

The concept is there but the fire looks more like a yellow blur than a fire. 
The ice texture is pretty good.
=====
From jgrimbert@free.fr:
It's a bit too lonely.