=====
From reinhard.pieper@web.de:
I like your idea. Good work on the background. Maybe a bit too "marble-heavy"
texture work. The sketch part is fun! :-)

=====
From helene.dumur@free.fr:
The picture is nice, but you are not allowed to use gimp for this ...

=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Unfortunately what you've done here counts as post-processing the image, which
is a violation of the IRTC rules. The finished image doesn't represent the
output of your 3D rendering program. sorry.

=====
From klynn@telefish.net:
A cool effect, but I think it violates rule 5f.

=====
From skirsch@comcast.net:
Great pic ... but your English leaves a lot to be desired.  I almost downgraded
the pic because of it.  Take care to reread what you write.



=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

This is a nice looking image and the concept is strong.
=====
From tomvw87@hotmail.com:
Psycho, but original.

=====
From file:
Very cool idea!!! Rendered background is a bit rough, however.
Notable for originality


=====
From file:
It's an interesting and original image even if, as you suggest, there has been a
bit of topic stretching. "Escher meets Kandinsky" came to mind.  Good stuff.
Notable for composition, originality


=====
From file:
Not opposites


=====
From file:
Notable for originality


=====
From file:
interesting..