=====
From douge@nls.net:
Frightening.

=====
From i-mcnamara@cornellcollege.edu:
Sigh... I almost guilty about it, but I laughed at your text file, so I'm giving
you a reasonable score for concept and originality.  Good modeling, texturing
and lighting.  For the hell of it you should re-render this scene with
radiosity turned on, maybe at a higher resolution.  Of course, if you did that,
would the picture be a collection of pixels or a picture of just one?
=====
From am3n_r3@yahoo.com.au:
Ultra minimalist 1x1 by the looks of it??

=====
From m-abel@columbus.rr.com:
"Rendered useless" might have been a better name.


=====
From sshelby@shelbyvision.com:

Nice B.S. Are you in advertising? ;-}> Actually, it does represent =
something: a pixel. If it were actually a pixel, it would be much =
smaller.