=====
From chrisbianchi@earthlink.net:
What renderer did you use? Bryce?

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
Nice concept and artistic merit is high.  Perhaps a string may have added to the
message.
=====
From tigerhawk@stic.net:
The model is somewhat simple (though cute), but there exists nothing else in the
scene and I feel a sort of emptiness since the rest of the scene is a sky and
ground plane.


=====
From a.martone@retepnet.it:
Nice interpretation. The wood texture should have been at least rotated, to not
to give an unrealistic feeling.
=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
More info in .txt file would help.

=====
From jgrimbert@free.fr:
A textured plane, a sky and an object. only the object is on topic.

=====
From jouni@mikrobitti.fi:
A duck toy isn't a bad idea, but the simplicity of background detracts a lot
from the image. 
=====
From p.gibellini@teinos.com:
Nice textures

=====
From bertram.henze@t-online.de:
Pity the ground seems to be just a texture - looks so flat. Real grass and
flowers would have gone well with that woody wood duck.

