=====
From chrisbianchi@earthlink.net:
Good concept, but image quality is really suffering.
=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
The concept works.  The image is engaging.  However, it seems to need a bit more
antialiasing.
=====
From tigerhawk@stic.net:
I liked where this was going but I think, as you say, you ran out of time to
really bring the peice out and expand upon the idea.
=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Good modelling & textures. Really needs the antialiasing though.

=====
From jacoons@ameritech.net:
Points for realism. I would recommend against using the ubiquitous "computer 
desk with IRTC screen shot". It seems to turn up at most competitions, so it 
cost points for originality. 


=====
From enrique.sahagun@uam.es:
light is very good, but needs a bit more of antialias

=====
From jgrimbert@free.fr:
Next time, schedule better and anti-alias, please!

=====
From jouni@mikrobitti.fi:
Even if the "computer as a toy" doesn't strike me as particularly original, I
like the composition and the colors a lot. Definitely too bad you ran out of
time - the concepts you mention in your text file would certainly have enhanced
the image. 

Radiosity in an image like this is waste of CPU - you would've probably made the
deadline with AA easily if you'd removed the radiosity and spent a while making
it look good without. :-)
=====
From llama009@hotmail.com:
The fully rendered version with full everything would have been good to see as
the dodgy edges on things lessens the quality quite a bit

=====
From jussi.kantola@iki.fi:

Nice modelling.  Hope you will post on the newsgroups with a better quality
rendering (aa etc.)


=====
From bertram.henze@t-online.de:
Pity the picture seems to have this resolution problem. Apart from that, the
collection of odds and ends could be very realistic. However, there is not
really a knack to it, not the "I like to touch it" feeling.

=====
From aj.ashton@gmail.com:
I can picture this with antialiasing and it's awesome... too bad you didn't have
time.