=====
From chrisbianchi@earthlink.net:
I really like the concept!

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
Nice concept and this image is notable for modeling.  However, the lighting,
textures, and ther antialias could have been improved.  Perhaps instead of
including all these models, just use the best ones in a more balanced setup.
=====
From a.martone@retepnet.it:
Very nice interpretation. You should work more with lighting and use a more
fine-grained texture for the field (wheels of the car on the right, green
field).
=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Good concept, but the lighting leaves the image lacking detail in several
places. I like your lamps.

=====
From jacoons@ameritech.net:
This has the style of "Bug's Life", which seems to have been the intent. Points

for originality. 

=====
From enrique.sahagun@uam.es:
This image is very funny, and with a higher antialias it would have been
perfect

=====
From jgrimbert@free.fr:
The spot-lamp seems to not have a noticeable effect.

=====
From fine@head.cfa.harvard.edu:
Lighting is too flat (too much ambient light), and the textures, while
plentiful, are too haphazard.


=====
From bertram.henze@t-online.de:
Simplistic foreground textures, underdeveloped background (e.g. the door - it
looks like the artist was not really interested in the background). So, better
done items set the standard for the picture (the voyeur), lesser items fall
short of this standard (the bird on the right), the picture cannot impress as a
whole.