=====
From skipt1@aol.com:
Very artistic rendering.  The concept is a bit of a cliche but nice
composition.
=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
It's a bit foggy isn't it? This is nice image with a very staged "still-life"
feel to it. The objects are a bit too smooth and shiny, more like pebbles from
a river rather than rocks in a desert. But on the whole I like it.

=====
From noe.falzon@tiscali.fr:
I like the almost-metallic stone textures, and the skull is nice_
=====
From AlaskaS@gmx.de:
Really great work. The objects are shaped fantastic and the textures were chosen
with much sensitiveness. I like it :)

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Rock textures are very good. Specularity is overdone, makes eveything look
plastic. The rocks sitting on top of the larger rock look unnatural.

=====
From i-mcnamara@cornellcollege.edu:
Hey, nice picture.  The skull model in particular is very well made.  Good
textures, nice lighting, and some interesting rocks.  Good work.

=====
From jacoons@ameritech.net:
Great image. I don't know if the "bright reflections" were intentional or not,
but they made me squint in the glaring sun! I would have like to have seen more
more roughness and definition to the textures (maybe a simple "normal" would
have sufficed). Also, two small rocks on top of the larger don't appear to be
natural because of the angle (such rocks would tend to fall or slide, I think).

=====
From ericf@foothill.net:
I like the ground, the little twigs are a nice attention to detail, and the view
of the distant landscape is good, too.  But the rocks, skull, skull, and sign
are a little too smooth, too reflective, giving them a bit of plastic look.  A
slight change and this would have been much better image.


=====
From file:
Well
Notable for textures, lighting, modelling


=====
From file:
If the objects are all your own work then this a very good piece of work.
Notable for textures, modelling