=====
From skipt1@aol.com:
The lighting and textures need work.  The colors are a bit harsh and the scene
and concept on the simplistic side.  Not a bad attempt for a beginner, keep at
it!
=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
nice choice of colours, but would really benefit from more than 15 minutes
work.

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
A simple but nice image.  The moon looks too flat, needs something to indicate
that it is the light source.

=====
From i-mcnamara@cornellcollege.edu:
I like the simplicity of the sky, it almost seems Japanese, but I can't back up
my reasoning on that.  I wish the flower were a bit less perfect; some
imperfections would have looked nice.  Much harder to make though, I know.  The
waves you used for the sand seem more watery than sandy; maybe something
rippleier would have worked a bit better.  Still, for a 15 min. creation, very
well done.  
=====
From enrique.sahagun@uam.es:
the earth is good, very good, but the sky and sun could be better.

=====
From ericf@foothill.net:
Very clean, but not enough to look at to keep my interest.  The rolling hills
are nice, but a bit green for a desert.  Needs more depth, more variation in
colors and elements.



=====
From raytracing@grayproductions.net:
Solid idea, just seems to need a little more attention.
=====
From darwallace@earthlink.net:

The sky lacks detail.

=====
From file:
Good idea bad rendering, flat
Notable for composition, originality