=====
From skipt1@aol.com:
Nice idea for the topic and good modeling work.  The ground looks good for an
image mapped texture.  The rest of the scene would have benefitted greatly if
it had the same detail.

=====
From povray@doublezero.uklinux.net:
This is a very good idea, and a good image. I think radiosity would have done
wonders with it. Though you say the modelling is simple, it is very effective.
My only real complaint is that the lighting stops a few metres from the
camera.
=====
From shevlin@uic.edu:
Good modeling work on a tough subject.  The concrete floor is nice, but most of
the other textures are a bit flat.  A lot of high-vacuum equipment is made out
of stainless steel, so you probably need more shiny and less dull grey in
there, at the least.
=====
From pbrasolin@yahoo.it:
The floor looks good, but looks also tiled, and that
is not good. The machinery and the tunnel look great.
//Paolo Brasolin

=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:

The concept is great but kind of difficult to show in just one image. Nice
modelling and light is also good but the textures look very basic. The floor
looks nice though. 
=====
From renebui@aol.com:
Excellent idea. A very big and expensive machinery dedicated to a very very 
small particle.
I like the ground texture.

=====
From sshelby@shelbyvision.com:
Although the scene is very well done, I didn't know what 
it was until I read the description.

=====
From jacoons@ameritech.net:
Radiosity adds a lot to this image. 


=====
From file:
Notable for modelling


=====
From file:
Excellent modelling - you're right there is beauty in simplicity. It would be
perfect with the right texturing.
Notable for composition, modelling, originality, lighting


=====
From file:
Notable for composition, lighting