=====
From skipt1@aol.com:
The most artistically stunning image in the round due to the perfect texturing
and lighting.  The concept, however, seems to be a bit of a stretch. 
Techinically complex but not to the depth that some of the other images went to
in this round.    Excellent image. 
=====
From fcueto@rice.edu:
Nice image but the connection with the topic is rather weak.




=====
From povray@doublezero.uklinux.net:
Though a nice idea and composition (if a little off-topic), the implementation
doesn't really do it justice. The nose and glasses need more polys, and the
stone texture is far too shiny. The hair is nice though, and the lighting is
quite good.
=====
From shevlin@uic.edu:
A reasonable idea, but the image does not convey what the description talks
about.  The texture on the face makes the woman look more like a burn victim
than a stone, and it makes the image a little grotesque.  This scene is also
technically unimpressive since there's really nothing in it aside from a poser
figure.
=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
A very veird image. This girl looks like she_s got a very ugly skin disease or
has some serious scare tissue all over her face. Really a shame as the image is
very poweful. Most details, like the light, the hair, the lips are simply
perfect. But the granite stone texture doesn_t work here at all. But in just
one day, what can you expect. 

=====
From sshelby@shelbyvision.com:
A rather disturbing image. Well done.


=====
From file:
??
Notable for modelling, lighting