=====
From shevlin@uic.edu:
The ruins are impressive; the vegetation growing on them is a nice touch.  It
would be nice to know a little about how the scene was created in order to rank
it better.  The griffins look very static, but if they're supposed to be
statues, then the farthest one to the left looks like it's in the middle of
toppling over.  The trees in the foreground aren't very convincing with the
floating horizontal bands of foliage.  The grey cylinder sticking out of those
trees is a little odd.  Also, the wooden platonic solids don't strike me as the
sort of treasure one would hoard.  Is the aspect ratio of this image right? 
The globe looks a little squashed.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
The concept works.  The image seems off balance by having all foreground items
on the right hand side.  The texures on the wings just didn't do anything for
me.  Your camera setting aslo seemed to distort some of items at the far
right.
=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
I like the wide camera angle. Tree leaves on the right look funny.

=====
From simplepsy@aol.com:
Nice modeling here. And the theme works well.  I particualy like the sky and the
plants.  I'd be interested to know how u made this. The software is good, and
it would be helpful to know how fully you have used its potential.

=====
From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com:

Very great looking scene!  Though there is a problem with some of the vegetation
hanging in the air.
=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The tree look quite good, except that they have some 
issues with disjoint leaves at the top.  

=====
From skirsch@comcast.net:
What's with the leaning globe?  Overall a good job.


=====
From file:
Nice architecture and trees. Good composition. Too many griphons. The background
is good but could be just a photo.
Notable for lighting, composition


=====
From file:
wonderfull sky
Notable for lighting


=====
From file:
This is just simply a well done image
Notable for composition, lighting, modelling