=====
From exether@demo.xandmail.com:
Shadows of the objects on the ground seem to be missing, that kills a bit the
impression of volumes.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
I don't look at descriptions - I think the image should communicate the meaning.
 I don't see the concept of future in this image.
=====
From kernal_the@hotmail.com:
I really like the texturing of the mountain range. You might want to consider
using lower intensity of light or light which is not so white it seems that the
image is a little washed out near the bottom.

=====
From pbrasolin@yahoo.it:
The concepd is one of the more original, but there are
some flaws: all the holes in the snow look strange and
the pillars should be more irregular.
//----------------Paolo Brasolin

=====
From glenn@mccarters.net:
No shadows on the ground make this image very hard to decipher.

=====
From t.degroot@inter.nl.net:
The concept is right, but there are puzzling things in this scene. Th elight is
very bright (if you look at the pillars) but it comes from nowhere. At least
with some media halo or lens flare, this would have been made plausible.
Standard mountains are... standard mountains! At least, stretch them a bit to
give a more natural look.