=====
From exether@demo.xandmail.com:
I didn't recognise your style this time. Nice pic. Isosurfaces is really a
killing tool.
Bonne ann_e. :-)

=====
From s.tessarin@tin.it:
Hei! not so bad as you think!!!
I like the idea and the aspect of the image. The only thing I don't like is the
extream flatness of the image, maybe some background low hills would help
=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
I liked the rough terrain and the rocks but it seems to clash with the
simplistic use of glass primitives - perhaps some a work on connections between
objects would have helped.  It looks like the one tube is going right through
the rocks.
=====
From pbrasolin@yahoo.it:
Maybe it is just an exercise, but the result is still
quite good.
//----------------Paolo Brasolin

=====
From glenn@mccarters.net:
Now come on.  You know that antenna could never withstand gale-force winds!  It
needs much more support structure.
I like the fine colors in this image, especially the atmosphere.  Delicate soft
lighting.

=====
From t.degroot@inter.nl.net:
Well tried! However, the foreground surface looks too flat, and the little rocks
seem to float above the surface! Very surrealistic in fact. Work on it, you are
on the right track.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
You've done a decent job with the isosurfaces, but one thing I've noticed is
that the abrupt end at the bounding box is visible in a few places (vegetation
in the sphere, for example).  One thing you can do is use boolean logic in the
funtion to change the how the isosurface behaves with certain values in order
to make it slope downwards towards the edge of the bounding box.  For example,
(x > 5)*statement would mean "statement" only has an effect when x is greater
than 5.