=====
From helene.dumur@free.fr:
Original and very nice.

=====
From ph.gibone@wanadoo.fr:
I can see all the qualities of this picture, but I feel that something is
missing (even if I don't know what). 
=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Good concept & good job on the macros. Only thing I don't like is the stones,
they look very rough. (I hope the lady isn't wearing heels!) 





=====
From david.madore@ens.fr:
Deliciously gruesome!

=====
From szabocom@zappmobile.ro:
One of my favorites. - I kind of like it too. >:) Take my gratulations, it's a
1st class work. I'm sure, you got talent, and innovation.
=====
From pmccombs@xmission.com:
This is a good surrealistic entry. 

=====
From kingofmycastle@gmx.net:
Great job. It's almost my highest rated picture.
On one hand it's breathtaking, so much expression
- on the other hand it's shocking, looks like a
wall of dead bodies or souls. What a pity, no
source.

=====
From kevinq2000@yahoo.com:
Interesting.  Could have used a more concrete
connection to the topic.

=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
You must be crazy! This is great. I like it very much! The only backdraw is
probably the foreground. The tiles look strange and this woman is somehow out
of place. Great work!


=====
From 25ct@lineone.net:
Freaky but surreal. A war memorial would be good for 
this, if only they/we could afford to carve it! Good luck, 
it's an evocative picture.

=====
From p.gibellini@teinos.com:
Mmm... very interesting and very nice effect: it 
remembers soem Tanguy scenes.
Well done!
;-)

=====
From intertek@one.net:

There's something very disturbing about the pile of bodies in your =
image. At first I thought of the mass graves of war time Germany, or the =
aftermath of an epidemic. But the bodies don't really look dead. They =
are as active as a pile of ants struggling to eat a drop of nectar. (I =
imagine the out stretched limbs give the mass its itchy energy) The =
color is odd... If you look out of the corner of your eye the mass looks =
like mud that had been spattered on a wall. Like these people were put =
there by some spraying process.

This one differs dramatically from the orgasmic blobs on your web site. =
Here the bodies are whole and clearly recognizable, though embedded in =
the mass. The images on your web site show more abstract shapes that =
look like bodies, or spurting mud, or melting worms. The web pictures of =
a similar ilk, also have rainbow-metallic colors and the over all shape =
of the masses form dynamic, compositional elements. Comparing this with =
your other images I think the addition of a normal person helps to give =
it scale and contrast but the over all composition is less rich - flat =
and mono-chromatic.

Of your other work, http://www.getinfo.net/douge/SPFINAL.htm, seems a =
better mix of blobs and near reality. The other five images in this =
theme (blob islands), make very good use of depth and over all =
composition. Though they seem some what limited - constrained to only =
blobs. It could be said of the other five that once you've seen one =
you've seen them all. I think mixing spiritual symbols, partial objects, =
and blobs (maybe some classical architecture? and/or the mechanics you =
know so well?) could keep you going for many years with fresh ideas. At =
least I hope so (speaking as one of your long standing fans).

Michael


=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
Perhaps there is something to be seen in the fact that a 
guy with no idea ends up with one of the most creative 
images of the round. Looks good.


=====
From file:
Notable for composition, originality