=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Ow, makes my neck hurts! ;-) Tower looks good. Something more to the scene would
make this a great image.

=====
From raytracing@grayproductions.net:
Though I've never seen the towers, your image really brings them to live.  Very
realistic.  Nice work.
=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
This a nice image.  Really like the angle of the camera - that makes the
strutures look much more interesting.  The only suggestion is to do something
more with the sky.
=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
This is indeed a great piece of architecture you chose to work with. I don_t
have any actual photographs of this skyscraper to compare to your work, but
that does_n really matter, does it?  Your presentation is what matter here.
This is a simple looking model, but the result is astounding. Your gray
overcast daylight approach really works well with this building. The position
of the camera is good, lookin up at this giant building from the ground. The
only thing I could possibly point a finger at is, why didn_t you place the
camera straight across the middle of the entrance? This is a symmetrical
building so there is nothing wrong with making a symmetrical presentation of
it. Great work!

=====
From jjaguar@worldnet.att.net:
I like the camera angle, it really gives a sense of the 
size of the towers.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Good idea but somewhat sparse, extending the view at the bottom and 
including some street/pavement etc. stuff would have been good.

=====
From slone@hiwaay.net:
Simple, but dramatic.


=====
From r@215-241.opf.slu.cz:
Oh, greetings from Sh. Connery... :) Very nice!