=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Good lighting. Furniture looks somewhat blocky.

=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
I believe this entry might be violating rule 5d. It is quite detailed, though,
and fits within the topic.
=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
With a little more variety inside the building and a more detailed ground
surface this would look like a photo. I say this because as the image
downloaded the top half really looks photographic. Nice work, particularly on
the subtleties of hoe the panels of the building fit together.


=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
The lighting is the most notable aspect of  this image.  I think more structural
interest would have really made your lighting work well.  Still a striking
image.
=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
Nice piece of architecture. Lots of fine details. Your text file doesn_t say
what it is, is it a restaurant or an office? Good luck with your project! Nice
work.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Good work on the building, a shame the ground and right 
side wall are only flatly image mapped.


=====
From r@215-241.opf.slu.cz:
very interesting
Notable for lighting