=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
I like this concept and the image.  The shapes are simple, but combine well. The
lighting looks a little strange to me, there are no shadows on the trees, and
there are some circular artifacts on the left side and in front of the colored
wall.



=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
Nice twist on the topic, though more detail would've helped.

=====
From raytracing@grayproductions.net:
Well thought out.
=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
It's a nice concept but the modelling seems too simple. i.e. there's no small
details in the scene and everything's perfectly flat. Also the lighting is very
dark, and there's a few artefacts that look like errors in the radiosity.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
The rendered image has a nice feel to it. - the lighting works well.  A couple
of things may have made it better.  The trees are growing out the structures,
these could have been gowing out of holes in the structure.  More detail on the
structures would have added realism.
=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
The concept behind this scene is clear and well defined. You bring every single
architectural element to the scene. The diffuse lighting gives extra neutrality
to the scene to underline that you are not working on any particular project
but on the very concept of architecture. Good work!

=====
From fergie_2002_@msn.com:

i must admit i never understood until i read the text file which was
enlightening but thats wat theyre there for
=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Nice idea, the color-grey contrast is well implemented.  Some more
work on the details of columns and other parts would have been good IMO.