=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Interesting concept. A larger render would show it better.

=====
From raytracing@grayproductions.net:
Your design is impressive, though the 360 degree view is a little overwhelming
with so much going on.  I would love to see a few of the detailed individual
shots.
=====
From xilo_m@hotpop.com:
It is a very nice render of a blue-print... but unfortunately, it doesn't seem
to go farther than that....  try to add some adventure, people doing things... 
something happening...
=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
The concept is good and it is creative entry.  However, it just looks  kind off.
 I find it hard to articulate the problem.  I guess it looks kind too 2D rather
than 3D.  Perhaps more attention to lighting would have made it stand out a bit
more.  The other thing to consider is your choice of color palettes (perhaps a
personal reaction) a more unified color scheme might have helped.
=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
Good idea, good model, but why did you render it so small? It is difficult to
make out, there are so many details, but impossible to see anything properly.
Even though you didn_t have time to finish everything. Empty rooms in bigger
resolution are better than not be able to see anything at all. This small
resolution makes the scene looking rather chaotic a first glance, but makes me
curious too see what it really is about. Render BIG next time! Your work is
worth it! Another thing, you can post more than one entries to this competition
each time, just so you know.

=====
From zesly@wanadoo.fr:
You would had to render it bigger.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
The small size cylindrical camera view is probably not such a good idea.  
It is quite hard to see any details and you also have difficulties to 
understand the geometry of the whole scene.  Modelling looks good from
what I can see. 

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
I feel the 360-degree camera detracts from the house as 
it warps the perspective, and doesn't allow the viewer to 
clearly seen any aspects of the image.  Note that this 
image may technically not be a valid entry, as the rules 
stipulate that all images be original (5.d., 
http://www.irtc.org/stills/rules.html), and from your 
description, it seems this scene goes beyond reuse of 
objects/ideas from before the competition period.

=====
From intertek@one.net:

Did you know that in POV-ray you can have a camera angle greater than =
360=B0!=20


=====
From slone@hiwaay.net:
Nice layout but difficult to see small image.


=====
From r@ip68-11-81-210.no.no.cox.net:
Unique (as far as I've seen) point of view, the house seems very well modelled.
Notable for lighting, modelling, composition, originality