=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Good lens flare.  Stones look a little too ambient.

=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Very silly :)

The rocks are too square, but I guess they could have erroded after they were
put in place ;) and the landscape is too hilly to be salisbury plain. I like
the sky and the sunflare. Oh, and did you get the right proportions on the
monolith? It looks wrong to me, it should be 1:4:9.


=====
From xilo_m@hotpop.com:
Good idea, but try working on the details in the scene...
=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
Interesting special affects but this image doesn't do much for the theme of
Architecture.  The stones needed to be rouned and roughed up to look more
realistic.  More dramatic lighting to match the special affect would have been
a nice touch.
=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
Good textures. I find the stones a little too square, not to mention the
monolith. ISO surfaces would have done the job well. The overall composition
looks nice. Nice sky.

=====
From r@cache-edi-hsi.cableinet.co.uk:
bit simplistic for my likings but good concept
Notable for lighting, textures


=====
From r@ip68-11-81-210.no.no.cox.net:
Nice interpretation, very simple design.
Notable for lighting


=====
From file:
take away those lensflares - and try to create more depth