=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Unique interpretation. Does that make them "frozen sperm"?



=====
From ggargett@attbi.com:
I like it.  Very original.

=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
It is an impressive array of special techniques, but I'm missing details.

=====
From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com:

A little simplistic, but I think this is what you were aiming for.  Nice soft
tone of colors.
=====
From sammyf@wanadoo.fr:
Nice idea!


=====
From N6re@mminternet.com:
Concept is part of conception and this is a unique moment....Visualization of it
is problematic..

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:

The egg looks a little bit flat. Everythng looks somehow too "dry".
=====
From ralf.treuherz@web.de:
The best idea. The sperms look very dynamic.
Cool.

=====
From david.madore@ens.fr:
The idea is very interesting.  The actual realization is good and has technical
merit, but somehow the final image is really - well, boring.  The spermatozoids
are good, but the ovule just does not conjure the idea of a real ovule (perhaps
some inner detail seen in semi-transparency would have helped).



=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Good idea.  Nice motion.  I disagree strongly about the 
film grain thing and the textures in general.  Real bio shots 
do tend to be fairly glossy.  This ovum gives the 
impression of a pink velvet pincushion on a fuzzy orange 
blanket.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
Nice work creating the inside the body feel - the 
murkiness looks quite good.

=====
From batronyx@alliancecable.net:
There is even a dimple on the ovum at the point of contact. I'm not particularly
fond of the image subject, but it is technicall well executed and certainly,
unique.
=====
From slone@hiwaay.net:
Everything appears very soft, the sperm a bit like cotton swabs and the 
egg like a pillow, but that may have been your intention.


=====
From r@jerkweed.kiva.net:
Haha. I don't think I could keep a straight face while making this one.  Well
done though.
Notable for textures, originality