=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
very atmospheric.


=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Good lightning bolt, but it doesn't seem to illuminate the city.



=====
From fcueto@yahoo.com:
I liked very much the lightning. The city ambience does not look very realistic,
I think. Perhaps it's not dark enough.

=====
From ggargett@attbi.com:
Nice pic.  Tech score low because you used photoshop 
to create the lightning.

=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
It feels more like a normal picture than a frozen moment.
=====
From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com:

I like this image.  Im just not sure if the lightening should be as thick at the
bottom as from the top? 


=====
From N6re@mminternet.com:
Several lightning entrants...lightning is very brilliant and drowns out all
man-made lamps and has a brilliant reflection...

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:

The city seems to be a little bit sparse, that is too big empty areas between
the buildings. Actual skyscapers are usually very close to each other.
=====
From david.madore@ens.fr:
Technically highly unimpressive.  There is some artistic concept, but if falls
rather short.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Good call on the lightning bolt.  It does look better than 
most algorithmic lightning I have seen.  I like the clouds 
too.  Good variety on the skyline.  I can't decide whether 
the foreground land adds by providing scale or distracts 
the eye.

=====
From matt@alledora.co.uk:
Wonderful water. That's something I always have trouble with.
=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
Nice work with making the lighting in the scene look as 
if it is coming from the lightening.  One thing that seems 
missing is a bright flash in the clouds to accompany the 
lightening.

=====
From batronyx@alliancecable.net:
Nice dramatic effect. I especially like the neon tubing around some of the
building tops; it adds interest.

=====
From slone@hiwaay.net:
Great lightning, but it seems to appear through a flat slit in the cloud. 
Excellent use of color in the city. Very artistic.