=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Very Bladerunner :)



=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Oooh, that dark ominous look... I like it.  But if the lightning is freezing the
scene, why do the shadows and light on the building all go the wrong way?



=====
From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com:

Quite some architecture.  But don't the faces of the building facing us look a
bit too plain?  When I first looked at the space ship I thought I was looking
at a hole inside the building, and the lights were eminating from inside it. 
But maybe it's just me.
 Keep practicing with lightwave, hope to see more.  
=====
From N6re@mminternet.com:
Lightning overpowers all man-made lamps with brightness greater than the sun..

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:

Quite nice image. A few technical points, however:

- You would achieve a better image quality by using a higher JPEG quality
factor. Remember that the size limit is 250, you only used a little over 50.
- The bump texture on the skyscraper seems to coarse, the indiviual bumps seem
to severl metres wide.
- it is not quite apparent what illuminates the building. And why only the left
half is illuminated. Lighning shines into all directions.
=====
From david.madore@ens.fr:
This is nice, but there are aspects here that I don't quite understand.  Maybe I
don't really get the point, in fact.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Interesting picture.  The city has a Tim Burton Gotham feel.  
The lightning bolt lighting is very good.  The color really 
has a high voltage look.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
This is one of the more sucessful scenes in capturing 
the "flash" of lightening.  The cloud texture looks good, 
but it lacks a sense of distance near the horizon.

=====
From slone@hiwaay.net:
Nice atmosphere. A more detailed multi-layered texture on the building 
might give it a larger scale.


=====
From r@jerkweed.kiva.net:
I think you're stretching the topic a bit too far.