=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Nice pic, but not a 3d render. 

=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
It looks nice but it's not been created using 3D tools! That means it's not
eligible for the irtc. Sorry, it's a really nice picture.


=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
Nice shot, but this is a 3D competition.

=====
From arte3d@luisvaloyes.uni.cc:
it is a nice illustration, but this competition is about raytracing (rendering
of 3d models and scenes), sorry, but your scene doesn't seem to be made using
any 3d software...

=====
From jguthkelch@netscape.net:
This is not a rendered image. If I could vote zero, I would have done



=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
Not sure whether "create a headline" counts as a raytracer... But the result
looks good.

=====
From awesomeamazingaaron@yahoo.com:

um... Very nice, but is it raytracing?
=====
From klynn@telefish.net:
This is a cool image; nice work.  But it violates the rules of our competition.

=====
From ruy@hipernet.com.br:
And what about the "raytracing" in Internet Raytracing Competition?

=====
From batronyx@alliancecable.net:
Did you even read the rules?

=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
simple but pretty

=====
From martin@simaltech.com:
I had to give minimum marks for this non-3D image.
=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Rules violation.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
This does not appear to the a valid image, as it is not 
made with a 3D rendering or ray-tracing program.


=====
From file:
Definitely not a rendering under the rules of the competition. Nul points.


=====
From r@168-215-245-100.gen.twtelecom.net:
Not sure this would qualify for this compitetion :(

