=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
More information in the .txt file would be helpful.

=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
It's very dark, which makes it hard to assess if the image is good. The clouds
look nice but they look like they're just a photo. And the landscape seems to
have no reflection.

=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
Very nice moon and clouds. Leaving out the landscape all together might have
made a better image, but of course wouldn't have been appropriate for this
round.


=====
From chris@ugan.com:
How was this image made?

=====
From jguthkelch@netscape.net:
A bit difficult to judge this one. Is it meant to be so dark? I assume this is a
moonlit scene and that is water in the foreground - but.....
Impossible to judge technical merit 'cos no details given about anything.
A word of advice, shemeis, the more you tell us the better we are able to judge.
:-)

=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
Maybe it would be nice if you added a bit of a description... Now I'm left in
the dark...

=====
From llama009@hotmail.com:
simply magical
=====
From angelsdie2@aol.com:
If you had commented the pic better I could have scored it higher -- I dont 
know how you made it so I couldnt give it a decent technical score...  it's 
beautiful though....

=====
From mbasca@go.ro:
too dark

=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
original, nice water

=====
From martin@simaltech.com:
A very nice image, but I can't judge the technical merit without details of the
creation.
=====
From 25ct@lineone.net:

Beautiful. To me, the water is perfect and I like the clouds. The
atmosphere of your image is quite realistic, I'm sure I've been there.
;)


=====
From SRJeff@vbbn.com:
Hmm.  I didn't like the fact that there was no description or anything in the
text file, but I put that aside.  The water and the lighting of the water both
look good, but the moon looks weird--particularly with its lighting.  It's
almost as if somebody sliced the moon and put the clouds in on a layer of
transparent film.  Overall, not too bad; with some more prominent stars, this
image would be up to par.
=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Looks nice but the lack of any description is really bad for the rating -
sorry.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Striking, but not much detail.  ?You also need to include 
info about the tracer and methods used.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The lighting effect for the clouds looks very nice.

=====
From hgregory3a@aol.com:
this is impressive. But no technical notes to enable proper judging on how you
built it.  Partial technical marks are given as this one looks hand crafted


=====
From r@168-215-245-100.gen.twtelecom.net:
too dark