=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Nice texturing, however there is really no focal point to the image, it needs
something to draw the viewer in.

=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
A nice piece of terragen-ing, but nothing particularly special.


=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
Beautiful mountains, but the sky needs some work.



=====
From chris@ugan.com:
Nice image but I have no idea how it was created!!! I suspect it's another
Terragen image.....

=====
From jguthkelch@netscape.net:
On the principle that I have no information on the creation of this image I
regrettably give v. low marks for technical merit. The landscape looks too
good.
Either this is a photo or we have a budding cyber-Turner in our midst. Which is
it? Come clean, Mr Zero; show us the code!

=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
Good entry... 
=====
From klynn@telefish.net:
This is a nice image, but it's difficult to compare it to the others without
knowing how it was created and what software was used.

=====
From angelsdie2@aol.com:
I might have scored this pic higher if there was more info on how it was 
made, what program was used, etc -- don't underestimate the importance of a 
description file.

=====
From ruy@hipernet.com.br:
Err... a bit more detail, perhaps?

=====
From batronyx@alliancecable.net:
the clouds are my only clue that this 'probably' isn't a photograph. A lack of
information makes this one hard to rate. If it's a 3d rendering engine of some
type then the ground and lighting are technically well executed. Otherwise,
photographs aren't allowed.

=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
u really don't tell me enough

=====
From martin@simaltech.com:
Nice looking image, but more comments would really assist in the judging.

=====
From jschmi@optonline.net:
How did you make this?
=====
From jrcsurvey@aol.com:
This answers the traditional, romantic concept of a sublime landscape.  The 
craggy features are quite believable.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
This looks quite nice but the lack of any technical description makes it
impossible to give more than a quite low rating here.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Nice image.  Info about tracer used, etc. would make it 
easier to judge fairly.  Have to go kind of low without it.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The terrain looks excellent.  Both the texture and the 
shape look very realistic.  The clouds, however, have a 
more "painted" than realistic feel.

=====
From hgregory3a@aol.com:
spectacular, except I can't mark your technique and construction method if you
don't tell us all how you did it and what tools you used to make it.


=====
From r@168-215-245-100.gen.twtelecom.net:
looks like another terragen image to me :( . These images could be great if they
had some point of interest