=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Water and background look temperate but underwater life looks tropical. Nice
modeling and textures.

=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
To me, the turtle is the nicest part of this picture because for a simple model
he has a lot of personality. I think that the turtle should have been placed in
a more prominent location to allow the other elements in the scene to move more
into the background. With the exception of the far islands, everything looks
close and crowded to me now.





=====
From chris@ugan.com:
great concept and image... your textures need some work

=====
From jguthkelch@netscape.net:
Funny how the best ideas are serendipitous. I love the split view.

=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
It's not exactly a spectacular landscape, but it comes close. I like the bright
colours and the level of detail, and I am amazed by the way you made the water
work.

=====
From llama009@hotmail.com:
awwww look at that cut turtle
=====
From batronyx@alliancecable.net:
I like. Your modelling skills are superb. Some bump/displacement mapping on the
turtle shell and the blue-green fish would have added greatly to the overall
realism. 

=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
i like your textures and you seem to be very proficient especially from a
technical standpoint. This sescape though looks like it is more of an emphsisi
of a romp at a beach rather than focus on the idea of landscape.

=====
From Sardook@telocity.com:
I like the underwater to air trainsistion.
The fish/turtle don't look quite like they are under water.  I think they need
more of the "filtered light" look like you have on the rocks below the water
line.

=====
From martin@simaltech.com:
Very nice.  The far away details (house, sailboats) and the excellent turtle are
what do it for me!
=====
From SRJeff@vbbn.com:
Nice, particularly since you made most of your models by hand.  The turtle and
the woman look a little bit out of place, but close-ups of humans and animals
are hard to do.  The rest of the fish/plants/animals/waves look true to life. 
All-around well done.
=====
From nealdelfeld@yahoo.com:
The IOR effect is nice.  

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Interesting idea and nice combination of an underwater and normal landscape.
But the lighting is quite inconsistent, visible caustics but no shadows except
those cast by some of the underwater objects on the ground

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Very nice unusual point of view.  For some reason, the gull 
on the arch makes the image for me.  The turtle is a bit too 
polished looking.  The water disturbance around the girl is 
very good.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
I like the "half underwater" view for this image.  The 
ribbons of light on the sea bottom is a nice effect, but 
the "sharp" shadows that break this effect are 
somewhat awkward.

=====
From glenn@mccarters.net:
Clever way to show two worlds in one scene.  I really like the =
wave-effect on the surface of the water.
Couple of odd compositional choices (the doublefish, the sailboat =
perched atop a mound, the eerie looming turtle.  Image would be more =
appropriate to a "seascape" than "landscape" theme.  Nice textures, =
especially on the turtle.

=====
From hgregory3a@aol.com:
the topless girl is a distraction from what is otherwise a nice picture.  your
turtle and fish and underwater plant life are far more impressive. the island
with lighthouse in the back left is nicely shrouded in a faint mist, very
realistically done


=====
From r@168-215-245-100.gen.twtelecom.net:
Notable for composition, modelling