=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Good composition. Nice textures, and good job matching colors and shadows to
background.

=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
The image has a kind of hand painted feel to it, which is nice. Nice details on
the models...

Though on the whole the scene seems a little unbalanced, I'm not sure if it's
the lighting or the camera angle. It looks like the landscape and objects are
being lit from different places: the shadows fall on the left of the lanscape,
but on the right of the buildings. That really unsettles the picture.

=====
From shay@simcoparts.com:
There is a lot of good detail here, and the man made elements fit very nicely
into the picture with the natural ones. A fill light or radiosity would help
with the hard shadows.



=====
From chris@ugan.com:
Nice image but I wish it was more indulstrial looking with maybe some polution
or some real human activity. good texture usage.

=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
Not on topic, but artistically a good composition.

=====
From awesomeamazingaaron@yahoo.com:

Amen to this image. Reminds me of the song "Big Yellow Taxi" by Joni Mitchall.
=====
From llama009@hotmail.com:
the subject was pretty good but the land in the background could have had some
objects on it
=====
From angelsdie2@aol.com:
This is a great image -- I had to check the location in the description to 
see if it was a place in Virginia (USA) I just went to -- it looks EXACTLY 
like it!  congratulations on a great pic!

=====
From juanjcampos32@hotmail.com:

A wonderful job on the terrain both in the foreground and in the distance.  The
grey sky mimicks a typical day at the harbour perfectly.  I can almost hear the
gulls as I pored over the details.  The depiction of the loading dock in the
harbour may appear inharmonious at first, but the docks orderly arrangement and
absence of industrial pollutants suggests a suttle harmony.  This is how a
dockworker of several generations may romantacise his craft.
=====
From batronyx@alliancecable.net:
Bryce and POV together. That's a first. (At least for me). I wouldn't have
guessed as you matched your camera settings between apps very well.

=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
i really loved the sky

=====
From SRJeff@vbbn.com:
Very good image.  The water looks very realistic, as does the industrial center;
very good blending and realism in general.  However, the bushes at the bottom
of the image look a bit out of place and superfluous; if you're going to have
them in, add a few more leaves and make them a little bit more varied. 
Otherwise, good show.
=====
From jrcsurvey@aol.com:
A good idea for the topic. Needs more realism.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Good work on the industrial area, colors of the whole image look good too.
The water structure seems too large scale and the trees are of course
somewhat abstract.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Pretty well done although the yard needs to be grittier and 
dirtier.  The boxes are much too clean and shiny.  The 
foreground bush steals the show and, unfortunately, sets 
up a level of realism clash with the industrial area.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The clouds/sky look very good.  I can't really say what 
it is, but the water in the foreground doesn't seem 
realistic.  Maybe this is because I find it too reflective.  
Excellent detail modelling the harbour.

=====
From glenn@mccarters.net:
Some good textures and mechanical details.  I think the nearby bushes =
hurt more than they help, because they are unrealistic (too straight =
branches).

=====
From hgregory3a@aol.com:
nice marriage of bryce and moray.  we will have try it ourselves some time.
high scores, we like it!


=====
From r@168-215-245-100.gen.twtelecom.net:
Great looking image but for what tis image is suppose to represent it'snot
industrial enough... more detail would have been nice
Notable for lighting, modelling, textures

