=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Good choice of subject.

=====
From henry@unforgettable.com:

my entry also used a starfield... my feeling is that your starfield is a little
too big, it looks like it is obviously a photo. Very nice image overall
though.
=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
This is indeed THE concept that describes loneliness... Even with the speed of
light the communication takes a long time.
=====
From cherii@att.net:
I don't know, but with so many stars out there, this just doesn't feel lonely.

=====
From darwallace@earthlink.net:
Had you done this in POV-Ray I would have suggested pure radiosity (no standard
lights).

=====
From rclee@oklahoma.net:
Nice model.

=====
From glenn@mccarters.net:
I see some artifacts on two edges of the image, and even within the =
starfield.
The Voyager model seems accurate, but the materials look more like =
plastic than metallic.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The detail on the Voyager model looks very nice.  I don't 
know if it's just my imagination, but the background 
picture looks a little stretched.  Some of the larger stars 
look oval in shape.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Nice job of modelling on Voyager.  Good choice of 
camera positioning.

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Very good idea.  Nice modelling.  I would have preferred a 
rendered background, but Hubble shots are okay too.  
Should have cropped the edge of the photo.  It is 
distracting.