=====
From tom@tomandlu.co.uk:
Is this on-topic? An image-description would have helped.

=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Quite pretty but I don't really understand what I'm looking at. Perhaps you
should have given a description.

=====
From matt@alledora.co.uk:
Ice texturing could do with some work - evidently there's no refraction
component. Ten minute render time means this wasn't raytraced, which explains
that... would have liked to see it though.
Modelling's great, and I like the idea of moving in closer to each one, although
I'm not sure how the top two images relate to each other. More description of
the image would have been nice (yes, even in bad English).


=====
From onefastjb@aol.com:
An explanation might have helped.

=====
From topher@csh.rit.edu:
A description would have helped a lot...

=====
From jjaguar@worldnet.att.net:
No description of how you made the image really hurt 
your score from me.

=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The ice sculptures look very nice.  I don't really like the 
approach of dividing the canvas into for sections.  I feel 
it would have made a better scene if all four sections 
could somehow be consolidated into a single scene.