=====
From nitro_glis@yahoo.com:
concidering the contravercy surounding your image, I rated it very low on
concept only becuase you didn't think up the concept for this round, simply
used it becuase it fit, however, I can't argue that it does look good, so I
bumped your AM up and you TM is bout average. :) I've noticed the IRTC goes for
originality and hard work, it turns out looking goo too thats a plus. I would
concentrate on those more than getting a good looking image into the
competion.
keep up the good work bro! 

=====
From philip.chan@home.com:
The scene almost looks real!  A closer view of your minatures would be nice.

=====
From beliaev@utu.fi:
The image looks a bit as if it was a phograph.
From your description there's a lot of things unclear to me.
However, I have no proof that this has not been raytraced or rendered, so I give
you the marks (quite high) a raytraced/rendered image of that kind deserves.

=====
From thomas_alun@lineone.net:
Technically. this is staggering! I had to look quite closely to convince myself
that you hadn't entered a photograph - the only flaws I could see were the lack
of motion blur on the dice, and caustics from the flying stand.

=====
From lrwii@joplin.com:
Hand looks real.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Nice composition, and good interpretation of topic.  The 
dice look a bit odd to me (kind of like the sides bulge 
out, and no depth to the spots.)  Texturing on the hand 
looks good.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Good models and overall realism.  Good integration of foreground and 
background using focal blur.
I like the soft shadows, but they seem to be choppy in places.
Is it me, or is the forearm cut off at the upper right corner of the image?

=====
From tm-ray@consistent.org:
This looks like a photograph.  Of course, the fact that the top third
*is* a photograph doesn't hurt, but the figures and hand are
nonetheless really good.