=====
From ecprod@bellsouth.net:
The only thing I think I'd change would be to remove the foreground
structure, it detracts from the center of attention... the weeping
willow tree on the left is superb! Great atmospheric and depth-of-
field effects.
of field.
=====
From elias@users.sourceforge.net:
Most parts of this look really great, I especially like the forest, the house
and most of the plants. Only the plant in the foreground to the right looks
somewhat artificial. The bridge also looks not completely right to me, probably
because of its lighting. The lighting of the tower doesn't seem perfect to me
as well.
=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Your English is OK, and the image is, too, if a little cluttered.  One question
to ask about compositions is why everything should be in the image.  You
mention the reasons for the foreground, but that was a visual necessity to you,
and not a symbolic one. . . many of the other parts of your image had both
symbolic and visual significance.  I like the thought you gave to how you were
going to build the scene.  

As far as hematic interpretation goes, imaginary creatures do not seem to be the
limit of what fantasy or mystics means.  

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Nice work... the plants and the buildings work especially 
well here.  The structure in the foreground seems rather 
undertextured to me, compared to the other buildings in 
the scene.

=====
From bballweber@austin.rr.com:
nice forest background..


=====
From file:
The best part are the background trees, but were they modelled or it is some
image doing the texture?