=====
From kingofmycastle@gmx.net:
Nice coulers.

=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Great colours. But how did that take 6 days to render?! :)


=====
From htkra1d@hotmail.com:
That's a pretty picture. Everything looks amazingly nice. One drawback is that 
the caste could've had more "surroundings" than just the water. Plus the
resolution is too big for my computer. Next time, write more about it please.
VERY high ratings from me ;-).
=====
From tony@awmcs.net:
Your water looks great the sun seems a little 2D. A glow effect around the sun
would have helped.

=====
From extrememarinerfan@home.com:
Maybe its just me, but the colors detract from the picture.

=====
From PovRayGuy@aol.com:
Pretty, but really simplistic.  The nude woman has no reason to be there.  Plus
the fact that its a stock model, and you lost some major points.
=====
From ZenPsycho@yahoo.com:
all too pink for my tastes. and the poser model has an awkward looking stance. 

=====
From mark.wagner17@gte.net:
Why is it that everyone who owns a copy of Poser feels 
compelled to put a nude woman in their scene?

Was it really neccessary to render this image at 
1200x1554?  I don't know of any monitor that can 
display this image at full size.

=====
From youknow@ucan.foad.org:
This is, I think, far too large for the small amount of
detail one gets from it. The sky takes up so much of
the image that even viewing it so it all fits on the screen
for me it seems overlarge.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
How does this relate to the concept of fortress?  A fortress is not an object
that resembles a castle. . . they may be two different ideas.  

Regardless, the colors and textures work well.  The poser figure almost seems
unnecessary, especially nude.  But, whatever. . .