=====
From :
Well, well, well... A dollchurch.  Nice done up, too.

=====
From batronyx@cadronhsa.com:
I couldn't help but chuckle over this one. Very original!

=====
From tony@awmcs.net:
Great looking teddy bears!





=====
From marlo.steed@home.com:

Nice image!  Fun.
=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Too bad the detail from all the work with the clothes isn't showing...maybe the
scene needed to be lit brighter.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Cute concept, and a cute scene too.  Actually, I like the 
way the windows look here... although they may not 
have turned out the way you intended, they seem to suit 
the scene.

=====
From mwsny001@mweb.co.za:
Very nice! My wife loves it.

=====
From tom@tomandlu.co.uk:
Nice idea, but the composition seems a bit of a muddle. 
The textures need work and it seems very dark.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Those teddies look really neat, Also nice work otherwise.
The lighting could be improved IMO, maybe some radiosity would be good.

=====
From youknow@ucan.foad.org:
This may be the best image of yours I've ever seen. Your
obsession with teddy bears has done you well this round;
it's a really cute and interesting take on the concept. The 
poses the various bears are in work quite well.

I think the stained glass is a bit too fragmented and there's
something decidedly odd about the wall texture.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Concept: An interesting interpretation of the theme.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Grr. . . fuzzy little cute things.  It is hard to distinguish objects, however. 
More contrast, some distance fading, more lighting (but not more light).