=====
From emediez@emediez.com:
Me gustan muchisimo las paletas de color que usas, y la composicion se equilibra
precisamente con los colores. Buen trabajo.

=====
From :
A sunset/dusk sky_sphere would help here.

=====
From batronyx@cadronhsa.com:
Very Strange. Their thighs come together at top in a wierd way.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
ok, but all those guys seem to be _very_ uncomfortable.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
I like the use of color here, and while the theme of 
money worship is used in several scenes this round, I 
think this is one of the best-developed scenes involving 
it.  

=====
From tom@tomandlu.co.uk:
The figures need work and variety, and the textures, but 
not bad.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Interesting idea, well worked out, but i don't like the linear part of the
lens flare, it seems to be behind the objects.

=====
From youknow@ucan.foad.org:
One of the better money-worship images, although I
think I would've chosen to clothe the worshippers in
business suits.The world they are in is rather barren.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Artistic: Nice work with the colours!
Concept: Certainly an interesting concept for worship.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Epistemology:
Does a Poser 2 figure count as being modeled by you?  Well, I 'll let the lie
pass.  
Do they have penises?  It is hard to tell, and other Poser images do not.  How
naked do you want them?  Where is their hair?  Are these even people, with
butts shaped like that?  If you have never taken a life-drawing course, you
might not know what a human body looks like.  And tell them to quit mooning
me.

Axiology:
What is it to communicate with a god. . . do you have to be on your knees?  In
front of a symbol of the god?  ". . .worshipping at the dollars' pyramid" is
using the word in the definition.  What is it to worship?  Is it a compulsion,
or can it be more rational?  Why or why not?

Ontology:
Beingness seems to be part of a collective.  Schopenhauer might have something
to say about that.