=====
From :
Add some pews and a more involved floor texture.  Awesome even as it is.

=====
From batronyx@cadronhsa.com:
Just awesome! Winner quality! But your description indicates it might not have
been made specifically for this round. Hard to rate accurately without knowing
for sure. I am truly sorry.

=====
From tony@awmcs.net:
Awsome! I love the light beams coming through the window. The best image I've
seen yet (17 images in). 

=====
From marlo.steed@home.com:

Very nice image!
=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Nice architectural rendering.

=====
From Stickgod01@aol.com:
Great looking light. Everything looks fantastic, except for the gold texture,
which isn't nearly shiny enough. Oh well. I like this.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Very pretty in its simplicity.  Some of the rounded edged 
seem to have a bit of angularity to them.

=====
From tom@tomandlu.co.uk:
A beautiful image. I haven't taken it into account in my 
scoring, but there does seem to be some doubt as to 
whether you met all the comp. rules (pics should be 
created for the comp., and should not be prior work) - if 
so, please take more care in future.

=====
From klynn@qwest.net:
Great image --really impressive lighting.  I'm concerned that you may have
violated irtc-stills rule 5d.  You may not use images that you created in the
past.  Your description is vague, but it sounds like you may have used this
image for another project or proposal?
=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
excellent work on the lighting, the textures could have some more structures
but that's not that important.  Modelling looks great too, just the arch above
the altar seems to have 'corners'.
There's a bit of doubt whether you did this especially for the IRTC

=====
From youknow@ucan.foad.org:
The absence of any sort of pews or other seating is somewhat
jarring. Otherwise, this is very visually pleasing, particularly the
lighting.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Artistic: Wow! Nice renovation to the gym!!
Technical: Very nice details on the arches in the right foreground.
Concept: A place of worship.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Epistemology:
Do we come to know religion in the same way as we did in the past?  If the
architecture is trying to enforce old ideas instead of go along with the times,
is that helpful or detrimental to how we come to know the worshipped?

Axiology:
What is the significant difference between a preacher facing the audience and
not facing the audience?  Why is worship now defined as the Christian worship
of the late middle ages?  

Ontology:
Is there a way to incorporate modern thought of the self and of religion into
architecture?  At least, the concepts within electronics (vacuum tubes to
computer chips) can be addressed significantly, if not the changes discussed by
modernism and post-modernism.



=====
From file:
Notable for composition, lighting, modelling


=====
From file:
Its very realistically modeled, textured etc.  Its hard to compete against such
professional work.
Notable for textures, composition, modelling, lighting