=====
From batronyx@cadronhsa.com:
You did a fine job of 'aging' the chalice. I might suggest increasing the sample
size for the focal blur to avoid the grainy look.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
The Chalice is clearly just a single surface, it needs to be lathed with a
profile that represents a true cross-section of a glass.

like:  \\
        \\
         ||
        --|
        --|

In crude acsi-rama

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Very effective considering the simplicity.  The texturing 
on the grail is nice, although it looks more like a jade-
type stone than aged metal to me.  I like the red and 
black tiles.

=====
From tom@tomandlu.co.uk:
The cup is very nice, but not enough on its own to carry 
the pic.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Maybe you could have added a bit more 'worship' in addition to the grail.
The pot also seems not really round so it seems a mesh rather than a povray
lathe object. The texturing and lighting looks quite nice.

=====
From youknow@ucan.foad.org:
The metal texture is very cool, definitely aged.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Nice job on the tiles for the floor. They look very realistic

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Epistemology:
The shape is wrong for that century, and it is not a poor person's glass. 
Imagine the differnce between Waterford crystal and a coffee cup. . . if you do
not have or value money. . .

Axiology:
Why is the grail the most worshipped icon?  I do not see the connection. . .  
What does a worshipped icon have to do with worship?

Ontology:
What relation should be made between a symbol of a symbol of worship and the
thing worshipped?  If the idea of god becomes more like Alice Walker's god,
then how would worship be synbolized?