=====
From :
A bit too simple, IMHO.

=====
From jhiggins@webone.com.au:
Wow, those models look pretty nice, if it wasn't for the blueness and the hair
it would be hard to tell them from a photo.

=====
From batronyx@cadronhsa.com:
I don't know what to say. I really like this one.
=====
From d_chappell_link@hotmail.com:
Very striking and defined.

=====
From tom@tomandlu.co.uk:
A scene made up of more of the weird babies might have 
been more interesting. I don't really know what to make 
of the angel or her glowing snatch. If you're looking for 
compliments, I can manage "intriguingly tacky".

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Although i don't have principal objection against displaying of naked
people, i don't think it is very appropriate in this case, especially
since you did not model it yourself.  Anyway nice work on the water.

=====
From youknow@ucan.foad.org:
Hmm. Technically on topic (at least loosely) but it looks a
bit like an excuse to have a naked chick in a picture. Angels
are typically portrayed as sexless, after all.

=====
From mark.wagner17@gte.net:
Why does everyone who gets a copy of Poser feel 
required to enter a naked woman in the IRTC?

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Artistic: Subject matter aside, it is a well put together picture and you have
done a nice job with the colours.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Epistemology:
I am anything.  I know nothing beyond that.

Axiology:
I am for pleasure?  Of course I accept that.  You may do with me what you will. 


Or is it that I am to nurse these two cherubs that my nipples point to?  Of
course I accept that.  My desire is wetnurse.

Ontology:
I am devoid.  I am an angel.  I am nothing.  There is nothing in me but
acceptance, and my thoughts are only what you make them.  This has bored many,
but you must be different, since you brought me here.