=====
From :
It's rather hard to understand with the modern clothes on the Poser figures. 
It's also too white.

=====
From batronyx@cadronhsa.com:
I understand running out of time. :)

=====
From tony@awmcs.net:
I am familar with the scripture but I don't understand the significance of the
skeleton.

=====
From bonsalva@bellsouth.net:
Good atmosphere, but I thought it was about awakening from a meditation until I
read the passage.  I still don't like poser manikins, but those are not bad.



=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
I wish you would have given the relevant Bible verses in 
the text file (or at least a summary)... why make it harder 
on the judges than you have to?  I like this a lot, 
though, especially the fact that the figures contain the 
only color in the scene.  Nice use of simple shapes to 
create a scene.

=====
From jrcsurvey@aol.com:
Some very entertaining juxtapositions.  Poser signature is nicely utilized 
and absorbed into the overall depictional style.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Nice work on modelling and lighting of the building, the finishes of
the characters look too dark in relation.

=====
From youknow@ucan.foad.org:
Hmm. Even after having read the Bible verse, I'm not sure I
really "get" this image. It is, as I would expect from anything you
enter, quite excellently composed, but I seem to be missing the
message. 

=====
From mark.wagner17@gte.net:
If you're going to refer to part of the Bible, at least quote 
the verses in question in the image description to assist 
those of us who don't have ready access to a Bible.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Technical: Nice job on the lighting in this one
Concept: Luke 2:46-52 doesn't say much about worship (at least in the bible I
have). 
Additional comments: I'm not sure I understand the significance of the skeleton
on
                     the window sill.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Epistemology:
What is Luke 2:46- 52?

You should include it since I do not have access to a bible.  Otherwise, at
least include a link to an online bible.  

There is a step missing. . . you have the need to express a clear concept, and
you have created an image, but there is no necessary reason that each thing
naturally develops into it's form.  

The problem may come from Poser, which limits your use of figure and shape. 
Thinking in those terms could directly help in making the whole.

If it supposed to be Jesus, he was not blond.  Where are you getting your verses
from?

Axiology:
The kid is a pretentious little jerk, and I would not have anything to do with
him, if I could possibly help it, and I certainly wouldn't make such a big deal
out of it.

Ontology:
From the little I could understand, only the architecture is alive and well. 
This is true both in your description and in the image.  If you are not going
to hand-design the characters, they may be better represented some other way. 




=====
From file:
Notable for modelling


=====
From file:
Notable for modelling