=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
Well done.

=====
From tim_cutho@smileyface.com:

Cool effect, and well done on the painting, it looks like a real one.
=====
From hgregory3@aol.com:
Artistic - Nice, and effective
Technical - Demanding technical work, well done. Good notes!  I like your
skyscrapers!!!
Concept - A definite contrast, good story, and executed the same way I did
mine (an out the window shot.)

=====
From steve@neurotrain.com:
A 17 T 18 C 20
Very well done!
The overall layout is good, lighting is good.
Technically you lost a few point because of the simplistic 
textures (the wood on the window frame especially).  The 
"real" bldgs all look far too clean.  I like the smoke or 
stain on the window over the tallest bldg ...nice touch, 
but you needed that everywhere.  The 300+ year old 
Cathedral looks as new as the skyscrapers.  The speckle 
that is on it looks painted on.
Excellent concept - multiple contrasts everywhere

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Nice concept... I like the line drawing of the cathedral, 
especially since it's not an image map.  

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Very unusual way to make a "non image_mapped" image.  Bravo.  At first, I
thought the sketch had a glass surface, blurrily reflecting the background
of the museum.  Something's wrong with the entire perspective of the scene,
but I can't put my finger on it.

=====
From hfventer@ing.sun.ac.za:
Great immage, but the wall texture some how detracts 
from the whole.

=====
From mark.wagner17@gte.net:
Try rendering this with a 2:1 aspect ratio at 1200x600 or 
so.  Currently, the image feels cramped, since the frames 
around the two subjects of the image extend out of the 
picture.


=====
From file:
good concept.
Notable for originality


=====
From file:
I love the watercolour - the texturing and the scaling of the real buildings
lacks depth IMHO