=====
From charliemc@prodigy.net:
Nice stuff.

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Very Dali-esque in style, with an interesting composition. Metal textures are
very impressive. I'm not sure about the hard shadows, artistically, but you're
right in that they add to the contrast in the scene. I like the light on the
ground and the two objects in the background to give the image some depth.

=====
From hgregory3@aol.com:
Artistic - Pleasing to the eye. Nice.
Concept - A different sort of contrast.

=====
From steve@neurotrain.com:
A 13 T 15 C 9
The picture is well framed and I would like the lighting 
better if there weren't shadows.  The two objects in the 
background is unnecessary and are distracting.
Techincal:  Even on an alien landscape anything 
prouting out of the ground would cause a crack, 
disruption of mound of some sort.
I just don't see the contrast...

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
I like the shaping on the objects.  Nice metal textures.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Surprisingly effective.  I think you achieved exactly what you were aiming
for.

=====
From hfventer@ing.sun.ac.za:
The contrast of metal and organic forms is not that 
pronounced, since we have lots of organic looking metal 
things in every day life.  Adding angular natural materials 
would have brought the point home.

=====
From fabien.mosen@skynet.be:
Nice shapes, overall, though I'm not convinced by the 
lighting (a little hard and confusing)


=====
From file:
I can't understand why someone would like to enter the same image two times in
the same competition, specially when that competition allows only original
entries made specifically for the current round. You clearly sent this image
again intentionally, bcos I see you have slighty modified the original txt
submitted to "IMAGINARY WORLDS".      jaime@ctav.es