=====
From mjklein00@msn.com:
Great image, nice details!









=====
From elvish_archer@mailcity.com:
I think the main problems is no life in the lab 


=====
From stephenhasmail@yahoo.com:
Objects are very nice, but you're right, the composition isn't great.  It kind
of turns into a clutter instead of a layout.  The spotlight wasn't a bad idea,
but it makes the scene very unrealistic.

=====
From shout@ozten.com:
Nice book!

=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
Looks like my desk.  By not having a complete picture in mind I think you have
more acurately captured an early lab environment.

=====
From marlo.steed@home.com:

Very nice image... nice use of color texture and mood.
=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
There's definitely some nice work here.  The microscope 
looks great (good decision to make it the primary focus 
of the scene).  I like the drawers on the little wooden 
cabinet too.  The lantern could use some work, and the 
curving on the book pages looks a bit too angular to me.  
The shadow cast by the scale adds a nice touch.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Very nice details here and there.Liked specially the contents of the bottles,
very 
reslitic. Only lighting is a bit strange, with that spolights. I would have
prefered
a more natural light for filling, as a sunlight trough the window. Very good
anyhow!

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Very nice. I'm impressed with the microscope and the brass colouring macro -
I must try this myself. The book code sounds painful, but it looks pretty good.

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
I particularly liked the way the book's pages look.  This one was fifth-equal
in my voting.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Artistic: Nice, microscope needed a bit of shine on the brass.
Technical:  High marks for a very, very impressive second IRTC entry attempt. 
More impressive that NO modeler was used.
Theme:  It's a lab


=====
From file:
Notable for composition, modelling