=====
From digitalburn@totalise.co.uk:
nice, althought the sky needs work.



=====
From darwallace@earthlink.net:
No arguments with this one... my technical expectations are simply higher when
commercial packages are involved.

=====
From pbourke@swin.edu.au:
Good Architectural concept rendering.


=====
From dvnss@mega.ist.utl.pt:
Great idea for a touristic place!
It just had to be made in a place with calm waters (perhaps in an interior sea)

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Spectacular!  Nice attention to detail... the beach is just a bit too plain...
=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
Neat Dock. A place I'd like to stop and eat at. The sky looks nice and
realistic.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Very cool.
=====
From bbowen@cswnet.com:
Interesting community design.

=====
From angelaperry@webcombo.net:
Very strong technically. Artistically rendered and produced.
~A. Perry

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
You know, it almost looks real, but I would not trust walking on that
footpath. I'd love to see some physical support prior.
Pretty cool image.
The clouds right on the horizon don't look very real though.
I like the rather artistic construction.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
This is nice... I really like the walkway here.  The water 
and sky look good too.  Nice job.

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
Thsi is a really good looking image, some nice modelling but the horizon
looks a bit sharp.  

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Nice picture.  
The lines tend to point toward the bridge in the middle right,     which doesn't
seem to make sense. . . what is the interest in that particular area of the
image?  Also, though the work is very good, a scene like this allows very
little fascination, unless it is a great composition. . . that is, unless the
image has a reason for being _other_ than the content or theme, it bores me
after I have gotten everything I _wish_ to know from it.  It should also make
me want to know more about it, visually, themeatically, etc.