=====
From darwallace@earthlink.net:
The scuba gear is lacking somewhat... or was that your intention all along?

=====
From pbourke@swin.edu.au:
Interesting, but....
I guess I just didn't like it even though it seems quite good technically.

=====
From a.vannini@mclink.it:
Try to remove figure's genitalia, the next time ;-)

=====
From panthus@xtra.co.nz:
Good models and interesting reflections on the top surface of the water. Maybe
some bubbles from the subs would have counter-pointed the lack of life in the
guy? or (I know it's cliche) searching spotlights?

=====
From dvnss@mega.ist.utl.pt:
Strange, but very well done

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Couldn't quite figure this one out... nice lighting and interesting angle.
=====
From bbowen@cswnet.com:
The texture on the 'man' makes him look mechanical, robotic. First time I've
ever seen a robot with such a prominent set of er. . equipment.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Ok, but I'm not sure this is not just taking advantage of the subject
for an unrelated matter.
Some more comments may have helped me understand better.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Nice use of camera angle to make the figure more 
imposing.  The machines look good.  Doesn't really look 
like the objects are underwater, though.

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
A nice image, but I think you need to decide which way your going to go with it
and then make some big changes. Either go for a realism/adverture-film type
look
and improve all the textures, add items of interest like fish, make the surface
of the water more visible and interesting etd.  Or go for the cartoon/comic
look
and try to flatten it a bit, and put some outragious cliche in there like a
shark
bearing it's teeth or a bomb exploding with a boom bubbel etc.  

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
The texture on the man is a little ambiguous, as well as what the emergancy
actually _is_.  Good luck with the comics.