=====
From loomsbury@yahoo.com:
This is nice, but you really need to work on your plastic water.  Also, why do
the walkways on the sides there look like plastic ice?  They look a bit too
much like the water.  I like the modeling on the boxes, lights, and wires
though.

=====
From pmccombs@hotmail.com:
Excellent textures, models.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Interesante huida del tema... y no te lo vas a creer, pero estaba trabajando 
en una imagen identica a esta (no para la competicion). Ahora, claro esta, la 
voy a abandonar (es que es exactamente igual!). Suerte!



=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
The bricks look awsome. Good lighting and fog. The water seems a little too
dense perhaps a little more transparency or a little less reflection would do
the trick.

=====
From jd@surveyor.in-berlin.de:
Looks good, especially the waste water, but the stones are a bit too regulary.

=====
From Stickgod01@aol.com:
Notable for texturing and excellent water heightfeild Very real looking


=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Very nice image.... liked the atmosphere.  However, the texure on the ground was
lacking.
=====
From tom@tomandlu.force9.co.uk:
I loved this. A bit unsure whether it was entirely on theme.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
This is nice... everything seems to work well together 
and the textures are good.  The water looks a bit 
gelatinous to me, though.  Nice work.

=====
From tonyv@iafrica.com:
Simple but effective. But it does seem to be a little too perfect and
symmetrical.

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
A nice moody image, with an interesting take on the topic. Technically
this looks brilliant, and artistically well composed and lit. About all I
can suggest is a rat or three.


=====
From file:
Great idea to show us the underside of the city.
Notable for originality