=====
From chris@bluelectrode.com:
Great image.  Simplistic yet well structured with a good composition.  Nice use
of a pseudo-focal blur, even though the real thing would have been more
technically correct.  

Overall a beauty.  One of my top ten.
=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
great rocks!  ...and wonderful realism overall.

=====
From YaelParis@operamail.com:
Nice composition maybe the water is a bit too flat. I really like the
lightning!


=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
you should be a landscape designer

=====
From tom@tomandlu.force9.co.uk:
Very nice - a bit of weathering on the sunshade, and some work on the water
would have pushed my score up.

=====
From ameede@madmac.com:
ameede@madmac.com
=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Does this belong to a private house or to a building block ?
In the latter case I would fear for my privacy ...
A very nice submission.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Very appropiated aspect ratio. Very nice details. All well done, fine, calm.
Great!

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Technical - You have done a wonderful job with the lighting and blurring effects
but did
       you also create the furnishings or are they imported objects?
Artistic - Very good
Theme - a different interpretation of a garden

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
This is beautiful to look at. Very nicely done. The water reflection gradient
is
very effective, but I would like to see at least a few ripples there so we can
actually
see the surface! I can't tell for sure if you used a refractive index for the
water,
but it doesn't look like it - in whihc case that would help too. That's about
all
the criticism I can come up with - this is really very good overall.