=====
From chris@bluelectrode.com:
Beautiful...although radiosity may have helped create a more realistic tonal
background.

=====
From clintona@ibm.net:
A great, realistic image.  I love the choice of colour and layout of the scene. 
One of my favorites.
=====
From trioker@wanadoo.fr:
Wonderful job !






=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
very nice, tons of detail, great realism and right on track 
for theme

=====
From YaelParis@operamail.com:
The picture is a bit too grainy and I don't like the wood texture. It's sad
because it somewhat ruins the wok you did on the path and the vegetation (both
are awesome)

=====
From emediez@emediez.com:
Beautiful and interesting work, and specially, a highly efficient management of
resources. Congratulations.



=====
From tom@tomandlu.force9.co.uk:
Very appealing with lots of detail and nice textures. The
contrast/brightness seems a little strong and the grain of the wood a little
odd (I loved it though).

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Very nice, very well crafted.
Just that the sunflower petals (the ones close by) seem too flat, a little
curve
would have enhanced the look of the few that are close to the viewer.
The pebbles have a strange colour.
A brilliant composition, very natural looking, rather gifted.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Really great! Beautiful, detailed, well composed. Very technical also. Only the
sky seems a bit flat compared with the rest of the image detail. 

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Technical - the flowers you have created are perfect  
Artistic - pretty good although the image seems to have a slight solarized (?)
appearance
Theme - definately  a garden

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Nice modelling and composition. The sky is a bit blank though and there are
some
very dark shadows which make it difficult to see anything in those areas. A
little
but of fill lighting to even out the contrast would help, I think.