=====
From jake@snafu.de:
Nice planet

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
You are stretching it, just to make a sci-fi image.  It may 
have been easier and better to just use several discs to 
make the rings.

=====
From archangel@wxs.nl:
Uhm.. Do these rings really create shadows on te surface? I think not...

=====
From tglover@nettally.com:
Wow - lot's of work for the planet -- it paid off - nice! Looks good and is
accurate.

Ship looks pretty good, but should it be center stage?  Detracts attention
from great Saturn -- maybe needs to be de-emphasized?  It and Saturn seem to
fight for attention.

Again cool outcome for a lot of work on the planet.  Nice trick with the
opaque disk.


=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Interesting, but I would not really call Saturn a landmark.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Nice image, but thin connection to "landmarks".  Good planet and rings.
Good lighting techniques.  Imaginative but realistic ship.
Funny, I cannot decide which direction the ship is moving.

=====
From mark.wagner17@gte.net:
The rings look too solid.  Other than that, you captured 
the feel of those magazine covers quite well.

=====
From clem@dhol.com:
The ship model is the best part here.  Saturn needs more 
detail and the rings are too solid.  Some indication of 
Saturn's moons would be good.  The ship needs more 
texture detail.  If you are going to throw in a pun like the 
ship's name, you ought to reflect it thematically somehow.


=====
From file:
Notable for lighting, textures