=====
From uwezi@geocities.com:
I don't know exaclty why - but I like this image
and the mountain in the back surely is a landmark!

=====
From archangel@wxs.nl:
Uhm.. It doesn't really look like untouched nature, more like some artificial,
plastic teletubby landscape.. But, well, it's still quite good...

=====
From tglover@nettally.com:
Nice trees - especially the random color of leaves -- good touch.  Bushes
and grass work well at this range.  I'll have to check out the Genesis tool
kit - placing things on HF by hand sucks!

Far mountains look strange -- too vegitated or too steep.

The butterfiles may be too much.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
It is nice and looks pretty gifted, but as you say, not quite on the theme boy.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
A nice bright landscape that looks like a fairy tale.

=====
From mark.wagner17@gte.net:
The water is far too white.

=====
From clem@dhol.com:
Off topic.  Butterflies are too symmetric.  Distant mountains 
are too sharp to be stable and too regular.  Mountains 
need plants and/or snow.  Water is too white and opaque.  
Use of light is very good indeed.  The scene is a very nice 
landscape.  The leaf coloration and the ground cover are 
very good.  You show a lot of potential if you will only stick 
to the topic.